At issue: Whether there was a breach of natural justice due to the Tribunal’s consideration of the new material doubting the existence of anthropogenic climate change.
At issue: Whether the determination of the fees, upon which the charges to it were based, was invalid. As an interlocutory measure it has sought extensive discovery going to the costs of supplying electricity in the Territory. The question whether such discovery should be ordered depends ultimately upon the construction of the Ordinance. In particular it depends upon whether it is necessary in deciding upon the validity of the determination, to know what were the actual costs of supply to the relevant users in the period for which charges based upon that determination were raised.
At issue: Challenge to a water license on the basis that the allocation was unsustainable, particularly with regard to future climate change impacts on water levels
At issue: Initial case: Challenge to city council’s decision to allow coastal residential development without climate change risk assessment; Appeal: Application for city council to reject coastal residential development plan based on negative climate change risk assessment