• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Vanderstock and Anor vs the State of Victoria

Filing Date: 2021
Reporter Info: M61/2021
Status: Pending
Jurisdictions:
  • Australia
    • High Court of Australia
Principal Laws:
  • Australia
    • Commonwealth Constitution
  • Australia
    • Zero and Low Emission Vehicle Distance-based Charge Act 2021
Summary:

On September 16, 2021, two electric vehicle drivers, Mr. Christopher Vanderstock and Ms. Kathleen Davis, brought a claim in the High Court of Australia against the State of Victoria to challenge the Zero and Low Emission Vehicle Distance-based Charge Act 2021 (Vic) (ZLEV Act). The ZLEV Act, adopted in July 2021, introduces a new tax that charges electric vehicle drivers between 2 and 2.5 cents for every kilometer they drive. In addition, drivers of electric vehicles are required to submit annual odometer readings to state authorities from which an annual charge is calculated. The plaintiffs argue that the State of Victoria lacks the constitutional authority to impose such a charge based on Section 90 of the Commonwealth Constitution, which, they claim, reserves the exclusive power to levy such charges for the Commonwealth.

While the plaintiffs do not question the act based on a material issue of law that involve climate change, this case is on the leading edge of an issue and is therefore included on an exceptional basis in the database.

On October 19, 2021, the court set out the timetable for the proceedings. On March 3, 2022, the court made further orders amending the original timetable.

At Issue: Whether the State of Victoria has the constitutional authority to institute a tax on electric vehicle drivers.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
09/16/2021 Petition Download No summary available.
10/21/2021 Order Download Order setting timetable of proceedings.
03/03/2022 Order Download No summary available.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.