• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

ŠKO-ENERGO, s.r.o. v. Czech Appellate Financial Directorate

“ŠKO-ENERGO, s.r.o. v. Odvolací finanční ředitelství”

Reporter Info: [2015] C-43/14
Status: Czech law precluded, case referred back to court of appeal
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • GHG emissions reduction and trading
      • EU ETS
Jurisdictions:
  • European Union
    • European Court of Justice
Principal Laws:
  • European Union
    • Secondary Law
      • Directives
        • 2003/87/EC
Summary:

ŠKO-ENERGO, s.r.o. acquired free greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emission allowances pursuant to Article 10 of Directive 2003/87 (“Article 10”), which provided that EU Member states must allocate at least 90% of allowances free of charge from 2008 through 2012. The Czech Republic Tax Office levied a 32% gift tax on the allowances pursuant to Czech Law No. 357/1992, which had been amended in 2010 to impose gift taxes on free GHG emissions allowances. A court of appeal in the Czech Republic requested a preliminary ruling from the European Court of Justice on the question of whether Article 10 precludes application of the Czech gift tax to emissions allowances obtained free of charge. The Court concluded that the gift tax was inconsistent with Article 10, because it undermined the directive’s objective to temporarily reduce the economic impact of the EU GHG emission allowances market. The Court directed to the referring court the question of whether the gift tax “respect[s] the 10% ceiling on the allocation of emissions allowances.”

At Issue: Challenged imposition of a gift tax to GHG emissions allowances granted free of charge under EU law
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
02/26/2015 Judgment Download No summary available.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.