• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Non-US
  • Non-U.S. Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation
  • Home
  • U.S. Litigation
  • Non-U.S. Litigation
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Non-US
  • About
  • Contact

Shrestha v. Office of the Prime Minister et al.

“बस्ने अधिवक्ता पदमबहादुर श्रेष्ठ विरूद्ध विपक्षी : प्रधानमन्त्री तथा मन्त्रिपरिषद्‌को कार्यालय”

Filing Date: 2017
Reporter Info: 074-WO-0283
Status: Decided
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • GHG emissions reduction and trading
      • Other
  • Suits against governments
    • Human Rights
Jurisdictions:
  • Nepal
    • Supreme Court
Principal Laws:
  • UNFCCC
    • Paris Agreement
  • Nepal
    • Constitution
Summary:

On August 23, 2017 Padam Bahadur Shrestha filed an application to compel the government of Nepal to enact a new climate change law. When the authorities failed to respond, Shrestha petitioned the Supreme Court of Nepal to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate order to enact such a law. According to the petition, the Environmental Protection Act of 1997 was inadequate because it did not address climate change, the Climate Change Policy of 2011 had not been implemented, and as a result, the humans and ecosystems of Nepal had experienced grave climate impacts. Shrestha alleged that the government’s failure to adequately address climate had violated the rights to a dignified life and a healthy environment guaranteed in the Constitution of Nepal, and violated Nepal’s commitments under the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement.

In a decision issued on December 25, 2018, the Supreme Court ordered the government of Nepal to enact a new climate change law to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change, to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels and promote low carbon technologies, and to develop scientific and legal instruments to compensate those harmed by pollution and environmental degradation, among other provisions. The Court said that a new law was needed to effectuate Nepal’s commitments under the Paris Agreement and obligations under the Constitution. The Court further reasoned that the Environmental Protection Act of 1997 was inadequate to address needed climate change mitigation and adaptation, and ordered the government to implement existing national climate policy until the new law would be enacted.

Subsequent to the Supreme Court decision, the government of Nepal passed the Environment Protection Act of 2019 and the Forests Act of 2019. Both are linked below.

At Issue: Seeking an order to compel the government of Nepal to enact an adequate climate change law
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
12/25/2018 Judgment Download Supreme Court Judgment in Nepali
12/25/2018 Judgment Download Supreme Court Judgment in English (Unofficial Translation)
10/18/2019 Not Available Download The Environment Protection Act of 2019 (Unofficial English Translation)
10/14/2019 Not Available Download The Forests Act of 2019 (Unofficial English Translation)

© 2021 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

These materials are intended to be a useful resource and may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. They are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.

This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.OkColumbia University Website Cookie Notice