• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Ruling on Modification to Ethanol Fuel Rule

Filing Date: 2019
Reporter Info: 610/2019
Status: Decided
Case Categories:
Jurisdictions:
  • Mexico
    • Supreme Court
Principal Laws:
  • Mexico
    • Constitution
Summary:

On January 22, 2020, the Supreme Court of Mexico invalidated an agency action that would have allowed higher ethanol content in gasoline. The Court concluded that the precautionary principle and the right to a healthy environment require consideration of ethanol's environmental risks, including its contributions to greenhouse gas emissions.

In 2017 Mexico's Energy Regulatory Commission modified a fuel rule to allow a maximum of 10% ethanol in gasoline sales, up from 5.8%. The modified rule would have applied nationwide, with exceptions for Mexico's three largest cities, where air pollution is of particular concern. The Supreme Court invalidated the measure, citing the potential for higher levels of pollution with a greater maximum ethanol content, including the potential for increased greenhouse gas emissions. The Court recognized that the measure could lower the cost of fuel, but determined that economic considerations must be balanced against the right to a healthy environment and Mexico's commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as a signatory of the Paris Agreement. The Court concluded that a measure carrying significant environmental risks must be evaluated using the best scientific information available and should not be enacted without public participation. In reaching this conclusion, the Court cited the right to consultation in environmental matters as well as the precautionary principle.

At Issue: Whether Mexico's rule increasing the maximum ethanol fuel content is constitutional.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
01/22/2020 Opinion Download Draft opinion in Spanish

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.