• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

R v. Bramwell et al (“The Shell Six case”)

Filing Date: 2021
Status: Decided
Case Categories:
  • Suits against corporations, individuals
    • Protesters
Jurisdictions:
  • United Kingdom
    • England and Wales
      • Crown Courts
        • Southwark Criminal Court
Principal Laws:
  • United Kingdom
    • Criminal Code
Summary:

On April 23, 2021, a jury at Southwark Crown Court acquitted six protestors who were charged with criminal damage caused to Shell's headquarters after spray painting slogans and breaking windows during the course of Extinction Rebellion protests in April 2019. According to an Extinction Rebellion press release, a seventh protestor who had pleaded guilty due to child care arrangements was subsequently given a conditional discharge.

According to media reports, the judge allowed defendants to provide evidence of their motivations but informed the jury that even if they were "morally justified" they had no defence at law. The jury nonetheless decided to acquit the activists after reportedly asking to see a copy of their oath.

At Issue: Whether extinction rebellion protestors who caused damage to Shell's headquarters to protest the environmental damage caused by the company should be convicted of criminal damage.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
04/23/2021 Not Available Download Defendant - Bramwell, Simon Closing Statement
04/23/2021 Not Available Download Defendant - Jane Augsburger Closing Statement
04/23/2021 Not Available Download Defendant - Saunders, Sid - closing speech
04/23/2021 Not Available Download Defendant - Senan Clifford's Closing Statement
04/23/2021 Not Available Download Defendant -David Lambert closing statement
04/23/2021 Press Release Download Press release

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.