• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Philippi Horticultural Area Food & Farming Campaign, et al. v. MEC for Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning: Western Cape, et al.

Filing Date: 2017
Reporter Info: 16779/17
Status: Decided
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • Environmental assessment and permitting
      • Climate adaptation
Jurisdictions:
  • South Africa
    • High Court
Principal Laws:
  • South Africa
    • Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000
Summary:

The South African High Court has remanded an administrative decision allowing urban development with instructions to more fully consider climate change impacts.

Since May 2011, the Province and City of Cape Town have taken steps to allow urban development in the Philippi Horticultural Area (PHA). The PHA Food and Farming Campaign and its convener, Nazeer Ahmed Sonday, challenged those actions on several grounds, including that development would threaten a local aquifer. On February 18, 2020 a judge of the South African High Court found that the Province and City had made several errors and remanded with instructions to, among other things, reconsider the decision's effect on existing rights related to the aquifer "in the context of climate change and water scarcity."

At Issue: Petitioners challenged administrative decision allowing urban development.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
02/17/2020 Decision Download Decision.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.