• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Owen v. Casey City Council

Filing Date: 2009
Reporter Info: VCAT 1946; VCAT 522
Status: Decided
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • Environmental assessment and permitting
      • Climate adaptation
Jurisdictions:
  • Australia
    • Victoria
      • Civil and Administrative Tribunal
Principal Laws:
  • Australia
    • Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Victoria)
Summary:

The city council refused a couple sought permission to build two dwelling units, one single-story and the other two stories, near the coast in a designated flood zone (“Land Subject to Inundation Overlay”). Melbourne Water, the regional flood manager, had indicated that it did not object to the project, provided the ground floor was elevated to an adequate height. The core issue for the Tribunal was whether a coastal hazard vulnerability assessment—which would specify the nature and degree of risk arising from sea level rise and related flooding—was prerequisite to the council’s review of the building application. Noting a recent change in state planning policy and observing that “coastal hazard vulnerability assessments will too become more routine in the planning process,” the Tribunal upheld the council’s refusal and instructed Owen to commission an assessment before resubmitting his application.

The same parties again came before the Tribunal after Owen commissioned an assessment. The Tribunal found the assessment inadequate because it had considered only flooding related to coastal hazards and had ignored the risks attendant to riverine flooding, which was also expected to worsen with climate change.

At Issue: Permission to develop in a floodplain
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
09/25/2009 Decision Download Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal initial decision
03/23/2010 Decision Download Decision following assessment

© 2022 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.