• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Non-US
  • Non-U.S. Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation
  • Home
  • U.S. Litigation
  • Non-U.S. Litigation
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Non-US
  • About
  • Contact

Kennedy (on behalf of Sandon Point Aboriginal Tent Embassy) v. Minister for Planning

Reporter Info: [2010] NSWLEC 129 (Australia)
Status: Denied
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • Environmental assessment and permitting
      • Climate adaptation
Jurisdictions:
  • Australia
    • New South Wales
      • Land and Environment Court
Principal Laws:
  • Australia
    • Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW)
Summary:

Roy “Dootch” Kennedy challenged the Minister for Planning’s approval of Stockland’s construction proposal. Kennedy objected to the Minister’s approval on four grounds under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act: (1) the approval for the proposal was outside the Minister’s power because Stockland had made donations to the Labor Party of which the Minister was a member; (2) the rights and impacts on aboriginal people had not been sufficiently considered; (3) the assessment of the archaeological viability of the site was not adequate; and (4) potential flooding and extreme weather events caused by climate change had to be more thoroughly examined. The court held that all aspects of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act had been upheld by the Minister in approving the proposal.

At Issue: Challenge to approval given by Minister for Planning for construction proposal on grounds that procedure did not follow Environmental Planning and Assessment Act
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
07/29/2010 Decision Download No summary available.

© 2021 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

These materials are intended to be a useful resource and may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. They are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.

This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.OkColumbia University Website Cookie Notice