• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Instituto Socioambiental et al v. IBAMA and the Federal Union

Filing Date: 2020
Reporter Info: ACP 1009665-60.2020.4.01.3200
Status: Pending
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • Environmental assessment and permitting
      • Natural resource extraction
Jurisdictions:
  • Brazil
    • Amazonas
      • 7th Federal Environmental and Agrarian Court of the Judiciary Section of Amazonas
Principal Laws:
  • Brazil
    • Complementary law 140/2011
  • Brazil
    • National Environmental Policy Act (Law No. 6.938 of 1981)
  • Brazil
    • Constitution of 1988
Summary:

Three NGOs filed a lawsuit with the main objective of declaring null and void the decision of the president of the federal environmental agency (Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources – IBAMA) that allowed the export of native wood with less government oversight, allegedly violating special legislation, and a declaration that the federal government may not adopt such decisions.
The applicants highlighted the role of the Amazon Forest in maintaining the ecological and climatic balance, as well as a significant increase in the rates of illegal deforestation in the Amazon and destruction allegedly caused by public environmental policies. The applicants also contend that epidemics could be caused by deforestation and the ecological imbalance it precipitates.

The case is based on federal legislation and constitutional rights, especially: (i) the Union's competence to protect the environment (articles 23, and 225, § 1); (ii) the national heritage category of the Amazon (article 225, § 4); (iii) the principle of defense of the environment as the guidance of the economic order (article 170, VI), applicable to the timber industry; (iv) the relationship between the protection of ecological balance as a fundamental right, the principle of human dignity and the right to life (article 5); (v) the need to implement the fundamental right to health (articles 6 and 196).

The applicants seek injunction that declares: (i) null the decision of the president of IBAMA which to allow the export of native wood, allegedly without government oversight; (ii) the restoration of the effects of the rule of the federal environmental agency (Normative Instruction 15 IBAMA of 2011), which provides for the enforceability of the authorization for the export of native wood; (iii) that the Federal Government must refrain from issuing other normative acts of similar content.

The injunction was rejected by the lower court. Two requests for reconsideration of the decision were submitted, one by the plaintiffs and the other by the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office as a representative of the law (custos legis).

At Issue: Plaintiffs sought reversal of an act issued by the federal environmental agency that eased requirements for the exportation of timber.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
04/06/2020 Complaint Download No summary available.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.