• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Instituto Internacional Arayara vs. National Electrical Energy Agency and Brazil

“Instituto Internacional Arayara de Educação e Cultura vs. ANEEL e União Federal (Leilão termelétricas a gás)”

Filing Date: 2022
Reporter Info: ACP n 1063902-55.2022.4.01.3400
Status: pending
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • Energy and power
Jurisdictions:
Principal Laws:
  • Brazil
    • National Policy on Climate Change – PNMC (Federal Law 12
  • Paris Agreement (enacted by Decree 9073/2017)
  • Federal Constitution
    • 225
  • Brazil
    • Paris Agreement (enacted by Federal Decree 9073/2017
  • Brazil
    • Paris Agreement (enacted by Decree 9073/2017)
  • Brazil
    • Federal Constitution
      • art. 170
  • Brazil
    • 187/2009)
  • National Environmental Policy (PNMA)
  • Federal Constitution
    • art. 225
  • Federal Constitution
    • art. 170
  • Brazil
    • Federal Constitution
      • art. 225
  • Brazil
    • PNMC (Federal Law 12 187/2009)
  • Paris Agreement (enacted by Federal Decree 9073/2017)
Summary:

On September 27, 2022, the NGO, Instituto Internacional Arayara filed a Public Civil Action (environmental class-action) against National Agency of Electrical Energy (ANEEL) and the Federal Government to challenge the implementation of ANEEL Auction N 08/2022, which aims to hire energy from gas-fired thermoelectric plants. The Auction results from the Federal Law 14.182/2022, which determined the privatization of Brazilian Energy Company Eletrobras, but whose legislative process included the insertion of unrelated content, determining the contracting of energy from gas-fired thermoelectric plants. The plaintiff alleges that the climate crisis is incompatible with the increase in greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) that will be generated by the thermoelectric plants, which could lead to a 39% increase in annual GHG emissions for the electricity sector compared to the levels registered in 2021. It points to several negative impacts associated with the projects of gas-fired thermoelectric plants to be installed in areas of the Legal Amazon. They will generate socio-environmental impacts on traditional communities, native peoples, and protected areas; compromise the use of local water resources, due to the high water-use; and increase the price of electricity for consumers. This would worsen climate change and violate the National Environmental Policy Act (Federal Law 6.938/1981), the National Climate Change Policy (Federal Law 12.187/2009), the Paris Agreement, and compromise the achievement of the Brazilian NDC. It is requested, as a preliminary injunction: (i) the suspension of ANEEL Auction or the suspension of its effects; (ii) in the event the Auction is maintained, it is requested that the defendants submit an inventory of GHG emissions from all the thermoelectric plants involved, as well as the impact of the emissions on compliance with the Brazilian NDC. In final, it is requested: (i) the cancellation of Auction nº 008/2022, with the annulment of all its effects and the determination that no new similar auction be held on the basis of Federal Law 14,182/2022; (ii) in the event the Auction is maintained, that the defendants be required, definitively, to submit an inventory of GHG emissions of all the thermoelectric plants involved, as well as the impact of the emissions on compliance with the Brazilian NDC.

At Issue: Challenge of National Agency of Electrical Energy (ANEEL) Auction which aims to hire energy from gas-fired thermoelectric plants.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
09/27/2022 Petition Download Initial petition from NGO Instituto Internacional Arayara (in Portuguese)

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.