• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

In re Electra de Viesgo Distribución S.L., Judgment No. 6846/2009 of July 15, 2009

Reporter Info: Appeal No. 119/2004
Status: Granted
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • GHG emissions reduction and trading
      • EU ETS
Jurisdictions:
  • Spain
    • Supreme Court of Spain
      • Administrative Litigation Division
Principal Laws:
  • Spain
    • Royal Decree Law 1866/2004 of September 6
Summary:

Electra de Viesgo Distribución S.L. and Viesgo Generación S.L. (also known as E.On Distribución S.L. and E. On Generación S.L.) brought suit challenging the individual assignment of emissions credits contained in Royal Decree 1866/2004 of September 6, 2004, which approved the National Plan for Assignment of emissions credits 2005-2007. The decree, argued the plaintiffs, did not contain a savings clause applicable to the electricity sector (as it did for the industrial sector) to allow the adjustment of the credits assigned to facilities for which the reference period for the overall calculation of credits (the years 2002-2000) was not representative of historic emissions. Electra argued that not allowing otherwise eligible facilities to apply for adjustment of credits in accordance with their truly representative emissions periods resulted in a violation of the principle of equality. The Court found in favor of plaintiffs, inasmuch as the Administration did not provide a justification for not providing a savings clause to the electricity sector, and declared null and void section 4.A.a. of the National Plan.

At Issue: Sought annulment of provision in National Allocation Plan
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
07/15/2009 Judgment Download No summary available.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.