• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Grez et al. v. Environmental Evaluation Service of Chile

“Gabriela Simonetti Grez y otros con Servicio de Evaluación Ambiental”

Filing Date: 2018
Reporter Info: R-77-2018
Status: On appeal
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • Environmental assessment and permitting
      • Natural resource extraction
Jurisdictions:
  • Chile
    • Environmental Court of Valdivia
Principal Laws:
  • Chile
    • Law 19.300
  • Chile
    • Law 20.417
  • Chile
    • National Climate Change Adaptation Plan
  • Chile
    • National Climate Change Action Plan 2017-2022
  • Chile
    • National Climate Change Strategy 2017-2025
  • Chile
    • Constitution of Chile
Summary:

Plaintiffs challenged the environmental impact assessment of a proposed coal blasting project for failure to consider climate impacts. The environmental court of Valdivia blocked the project on other grounds.

In November 2018 claimants brought suit to challenge the environmental impact assessment of the proposed project “Incorporation of blasting as a complementary method in the mechanical extraction of sterile material in the Winter Mine." The Commission for Environmental Assessment of the Magallanes Region and the Chilean Antarctic had initially deemed the project's declaration of environmental impacts to be environmentally unfavorable. When the mine operator challenged this conclusion, the Executive Director of the Commission of Environmental Assessment reversed the decision, determining that the project was environmentally favorable. Claimants asked the court to reinstated the initial determination. They argued that the final environmental impact statement failed to consider the climate impacts of coal blasting in violation of Chile's commitments under international law, including the Paris Agreement, as well as the preventive principle. The plaintiffs further asserted the need to eliminate the use of fossil fuels, and in particular coal, on a global level in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

In August 2019 the court issued a decision. The court acknowledged that climate change is a global problem, but concluded that Chile's international commitments do not impose a legal requirement to consider climate change in environmental impact assessments. The court annulled the environmental impact assessment on other grounds, in a decision that the operator has appealed.

At Issue: Claimants challenge environmental impact assessment of proposed coal blasting project for failure to consider climate impacts.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
11/08/2018 Petition Download Spanish version
08/20/2019 Judgment Download Spanish version. Part I.
08/20/2019 Judgment Download Spanish version. Part II.
08/20/2019 Judgment Download Spanish version. Part III.
08/20/2019 Judgment Download Spanish version. Part IV.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.