• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Decision SU-698/17 of November 28, 2017

“Sentencia SU-698/16 de Noviembre 28, 2017”

Filing Date: 2015
Reporter Info: SU-698/17
Status: Decided
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • Human Rights
      • Indigenous Groups
  • Suits against governments
    • Environmental assessment and permitting
      • Natural resource extraction
Jurisdictions:
  • Colombia
    • Constitutional Court
Principal Laws:
  • Colombia
    • Law 388 of 1997
  • Colombia
    • Constitution
Summary:

Indigenous communities (Wayúu) filed a lawsuit against Colombian authorities and private companies due to the diversion of the Bruno River to conduct mining activities. Plaintiffs alleged violation of their fundamental rights to water, health, and food sovereignty.

The Constitutional Court found that authorities’ authorization of mining activities ignored the particular social and environmental conditions of the region (La Guajira). In particular, the Court reasoned that climate change has significantly impacted the region’s natural water supply. By failing to consider these climate change-related impacts, the defendants violated fundamental rights, especially those related to water supply. The Court underscored the relationship Wayúu communities have with water bodies in accordance with their worldviews. The risk posed by mining activities in a climate change-vulnerable region is of special importance and has the potential to cause significant harm.

The Court ordered, among other actions, the continuity of a working group to ensure fundamental rights are observed and protected. This group was also ordered to conduct a study that answers a number of questions posed by the Court, including those on the social and environmental impacts of the diversion of the Bruno River. The Court ordered the private company to begin mitigation, prevention, control, compensation, and correction measures to address project-related social and environmental impacts.

At Issue: Whether diversion of the Bruno River for natural resource exploration and exploitation activities violated human rights obligations.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
11/28/2017 Judgment Download No summary available.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.