• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

ClientEarth v. Belgian National Bank

Filing Date: 2021
Reporter Info: 21/38/C
Status: Withdrawn
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • Human Rights
      • Other
  • Suits against corporations, individuals
    • Corporations
      • Disclosures
Jurisdictions:
  • Belgium
    • Brussels
      • Court of First Instance
Principal Laws:
  • European Union
    • Primary Law
      • Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
        • Article 11
  • European Union
    • Primary Law
      • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU
Summary:

On April 13, 2021, ClientEarth filed suit against the Belgian National Bank for failing to meet environmental, climate, and human rights requirements when purchasing bonds from fossil fuel and other greenhouse-gas intensive companies. The Belgian National Bank has participated in the European Central Bank's Corporate Sector Purchase Program (CSPP), in which six national central banks purchase bonds from eligible companies to improve financing conditions by lowering debt costs. ClientEarth alleges that over half of bonds purchased under the CSPP were issued by greenhouse-gas intensive sectors and that the program, therefore, exacerbates the climate crisis. ClientEarth alleges that the Belgian National Bank's participation in the CSPP, by not taking into account climate, environment, and human rights impacts, violated Article 11 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU and Article 37 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (both concern the obligation to integrate environmental protection into EU policies). As part of its case, ClientEarth sought a preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice to determine whether the decision to establish the CSPP was lawful; it argues that it was not because of the failure to take into account climate considerations in designing the CSPP as required by EU law, because the CSPP is itself inconsistent with EU climate policy, and become it undermines the European Union's emissions reduction targets.

In December 2021, the Brussels Tribunal of First Instance rejected ClientEarth's application on procedural grounds in a judgment against which ClientEarth launched an appeal in early 2022. While the appeal procedure was pending, ClientEarth announced that it would withdraw its case "after the European Central Bank (ECB) accepted its legal obligations to consider the climate in quantitative easing reforms," which remedies the violations ClientEarth had alleged on the part of the Belgian National Bank.

At Issue: Whether the Belgian National Bank's purchasing of bonds from fossil fuel companies violated EU law.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
11/29/2022 Press Release Download ClientEarth's withdrawal of the case.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.