Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Campaign to Protect Rural England v Secretary of State for Transport (challenge to the A57 Link Roads Development Consent Order 2022)

Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2023
Status
Closed
Court/admin entity
United KingdomEngland and WalesHigh Court of Justice
Case category
Suits against governments (Global)Environmental assessment and permitting (Global)Suits against governments (Global)GHG emissions reduction and trading (Global)
Principal law
United KingdomClimate Change Act 2008United KingdomPlanning Act 2008United KingdomTown and County Planning (EIA) Regulations 2017
At issue
The lawfulness of consenting of a new major road project without considering cumulative carbon emissions.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Summary

In January 2023, the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), Peak District and South Yorkshire branch launched a legal challenge against the Secretary of State for Transport’s decision in November 2022 to grant development consent for a major new dual carriageway known as the trans-Pennine link road. The consent was granted via the A57 Link Roads Development Consent Order 2022. When making this Order the Transport Secretary accepted the scheme would “result in an increase in carbon emissions” but concluded that the “proposed development is consistent with existing and emerging policy requirements to achieve the UK’s trajectory towards net zero”. The challenge alleges the Transport Secretary failed to consider the environmental impacts of the scheme, including cumulative carbon emissions. At the hearing in October 2023, all parties accepted that the above ground was materially the same as the challenge advanced by Dr Boswell in Boswell v Secretary of State for Transport [2023] EWHC 1710 which was dismissed by the High Court. However Dr Boswell had been granted permission to appeal by the Court of Appeal. The parties were in agreement with the court's suggestion that this ground of the present claim be stayed pending a decision from the Court of Appeal in Boswell. Accordingly, no submissions were made on the substance of this at the hearing. In November 2023 a judgment was issued, which recorded the above approach at paragraph 7. The judgment also dismissed another ground of challenge, not climate related, that was heard at the October hearing.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance