• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR) v Commonwealth Bank of Australia

Filing Date: 2014
Reporter Info: [2015] FCA 785; 325 ALR 736 (1)
Status: Decided
Case Categories:
  • Suits against corporations, individuals
    • Corporations
      • Disclosures
Jurisdictions:
  • Australia
    • Federal Court of Australia
Principal Laws:
  • Australia
    • Corporations Act
Summary:

The Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility filed an application of October 14, 2014 against the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, seeking declarations that their proposed resolutions relating to greenhouse gas emissions could be validly moved at the annual general meeting of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia pursuant to s 249N of the Corporations Act 2001.

The resolutions included requiring the company to create and release a report detailing their greenhouse gas emissions and plans to mitigate the emissions, and requiring the company to create and release a report detailing the risks posed by climate change to the bank and mitigation strategies the bank would adopt.

The Court rejected the proposed resolutions under the Corporations Act in a judgment issued on July 31, 2015. The Court found that shareholders do not have the authority to propose resolutions that relate to the management of a company unless the company’s constitution so allows.

The Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility filed an appeal of the lower court’s judgement in favor of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia. The Court rejected the proposed resolutions under the Corporations Act in a judgement issued on June 10, 2016 reaffirming the lower courts judgement. The Court found that shareholders do not have the authority to propose resolutions that intrude on the management of the company.

At Issue: Whether a shareholder resolution seeking disclosures of climate-related risks and risk mitigation strategies could be validly put to a general meeting.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
07/15/2015 Decision Download Lower Court decision
06/10/2016 Decision Download Decision on appeal

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.