• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Asociación Civil por la Justicia Ambiental v. Province of Entre Ríos, et al. (Delta del Paraná case)

“Asociación Civil Por La Justicia Ambiental y otros c/ Entre Ríos, Provincia de y otros”

Filing Date: 2020
Status: Pending
Case Categories:
  • Suits against governments
    • GHG emissions reduction and trading
      • Other
  • Suits against governments
    • Protecting biodiveristy and ecosystems
Jurisdictions:
  • Argentina
    • Supreme Court
Principal Laws:
  • Argentina
    • Environmental Law to Control Burning Activities No. 23.919.
  • Argentina
    • Law No. 27520/2019 (Minimum Budgets for Adaptation and Mitigation)
  • UNFCCC
    • Paris Agreement
  • Argentina
    • Law No. 26562
  • Argentina
    • Law No. 26.815
  • Argentina
    • General Environmental Law No. 25.675
  • Argentina
    • Constitution
  • Escazú Agreement
  • United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
Summary:

In late Fall 2020, the uncontrolled burning of pastures in a Ramsar’s wetland ecosystem (Delta del Paraná) created a serious environmental conflict between different provinces of Argentina. This conflict gave place to several lawsuits seeking protection for the ecosystem, including injunctions and damages for environmental and health consequences of the fires. One of these claims introduced climate concerns.

On July 03, 2020, two NGOs and a group of children represented by their parents filed a constitutional collective claim (amparo colectivo ambiental) against three Argentinean Provinces and a Municipality. The plaintiffs allege that the government entities are failing in their duties regarding the protection and sound environmental management of the inter-jurisdictional ecosystem, which is key for mitigation and adaptation of climate change while also being at risk due to its negative impacts. The complaint asks the Supreme Court to (i) declare the ecosystem as an entity subject to rights, (ii) order the defendants to prepare and implement a coordinated environmental management and land use plan that recognizes the vulnerability of the ecosystem and its relevance for future generations, (iii) designate a ‘guardian’ for the entity, responsible for monitoring its conservation and sustainable use, as well as informing the Supreme Court about the enforcement of the judgment, and (iv) order that broad, early and effective public participation is guaranteed in any decision-making regarding the future management of the ecosystem. The complaint relies primarily on the Argentinian constitution, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the UNFCCC, the Paris Agreement, General Environmental Law No. 25.675 and Environmental Law to Control Burning Activities No. 23.919. The complaint also references laws in other countries recognizing the rights of nature, rivers, and other non-human entities.

On 11 August 2020, the Supreme Court made a first decision in one related case (Equística Defensa del Medio Ambiente v. Provincia de Santa Fe y ots). In the decision, the Supreme Court referred to Law 27.520 (Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Law) as a principal Law for the case and ordered the creation of an Environmental Emergency Committee and the submission of relevant information about the environmental problem and its management.

On 28 December 2021, the Supreme Court decided to combine all the related cases and informed that it will hand down a single judgment for all.

At Issue: Whether different governmental entities are responsible for the burning of a wetland ecosystem and must take immediate action to protect the environment and citizens’ health.
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Summary
07/02/2020 Complaint Download Complaint in Spanish
08/11/2021 Order Order from the Supreme Court (in Equística Defensa del Medio Ambiente v. Provincia de Santa Fe y ots.)
12/28/2021 Order Order from the Supreme Court.
12/28/2021 Decision Download No summary available.
08/11/2020 Decision Download No summary available.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.