At issue: Whether Slovenia’s decision to conduct an environmental impact assessment of Ascent’s proposed fracking projected has destroyed the value of Ascent’s investments in Slovenia energy sector
At issue: Whether the denial of the application for a Presidential Permit to construct the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Government’s actions leading to that denial amounted to unfair treatment of a Canadian corporation
At issue: Whether the SEA procedure imposes an obligation on the authorities to carry out a transboundary impact assessment under the Espoo Convention, an appropriate assessment pursuant to Article 6 of the Habitats Directive and an assessment of the project’s impact on climate change
At issue: Whether the state of Oaxaca’s ban on the distribution of non-recycled single-use plastic bags to protect the right to a healthy environment affects the right to carry-out business of plastic manufacturing companies.
At issue: Whether federal cabinet’s order relating to the addition of plastic manufactured items to the list of toxic substances in Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection, 1999 (CEPA) was unreasonable and/or unconstitutional
At issue: Whether and to what extent aviation emissions should play a role in deciding whether planning permission should be granted for the expansion of an airport.
At issue: Whether the Portuguese legislator has failed to implement the measures (laws and political acts) listed, and binding, in the Portuguese Climate Framework Law.
At issue: Whether Italy has breached its obligations under the Aarhus Convention by failing to inform and consult the public within the process of updating the National Energy and Climate Plan.