At issue: Negative human rights impacts of (expanding) fossil fuel activities by State-owned company Saudi Amraco, with support of major private financial institutions domiciled in Saudi Arabia, Japan, USA, UK and France.
At issue: Negative human rights impacts of (expanding) the Scarborough gas project and LNG facilities by Woodside Energy and BHP in Australia, especially on indigenous people’s rights due to damage to indigenous sacred art and songlines in Murujuga
At issue: France’s continued development of mega-basin projects in a context of climate change, and their impacts on the rights to environment, food and water, including the rights of smaller farmers.
At issue: Post-disaster recovery for the Indigenous Raizal people after hurricanes Eta and Iota in Colombia, including through reconstruction of safe, culturally appropriate and climate-resilient housing
At issue: Ongoing forced evictions and home demolitions along Karachi’s waterways, despite devastating impacts of unusually heavy monsoons and flooding, allegedly as part of Pakistan’s climate adaptation strategies.
At issue: Compatibility of the arrest and excessive sentencing of two climate activists in the United Kingdom with the right to peaceful assembly in Article 21 ICCPR
At issue: Thailand’s large-scale (re)forestation strategy to achieve GHG emission targets threatens the human rights of 14 forest-dependent Isan minority members in Sab Wai village, who are also land-right defenders
At issue: Whether Slovenia’s decision to conduct an environmental impact assessment of Ascent’s proposed fracking projected has destroyed the value of Ascent’s investments in Slovenia energy sector
At issue: Whether the denial of the application for a Presidential Permit to construct the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Government’s actions leading to that denial amounted to unfair treatment of a Canadian corporation
At issue: Whether the SEA procedure imposes an obligation on the authorities to carry out a transboundary impact assessment under the Espoo Convention, an appropriate assessment pursuant to Article 6 of the Habitats Directive and an assessment of the project’s impact on climate change
At issue: Whether the state of Oaxaca’s ban on the distribution of non-recycled single-use plastic bags to protect the right to a healthy environment affects the right to carry-out business of plastic manufacturing companies.
At issue: Whether federal cabinet’s order relating to the addition of plastic manufactured items to the list of toxic substances in Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection, 1999 (CEPA) was unreasonable and/or unconstitutional