At issue: Whether the oil drilling license obtained by ReconAfrica from the Namibian Government is legal with regard to exacerbating climate change in a region especially prone to droughts and endangerment of wildlife, as well as the duty to consult local communities.
At issue: Whether Norway has violated the fundamental rights of Norwegian citizens and lower legislation through the adoption of three decisions concerning the plans for development and operation of petroleum (oil and gas) deposits in the North Sea by failing to include Scope 3 emissions in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
At issue: Whether the SEA procedure imposes an obligation on the authorities to carry out a transboundary impact assessment under the Espoo Convention, an appropriate assessment pursuant to Article 6 of the Habitats Directive and an assessment of the project’s impact on climate change
At issue: The lawsuit seeks to order the defendants to adopt effective measures to comply with the guidelines, deadlines and targets set out in federal and state (Rio Grande do Sul) climate laws.
At issue: Whether a precautionary order can be ordered preventing seismic exploration/fossil fuel exploitation until proper environmental impact assessments can be conducted
At issue: Can a permanent injunction be filed under a Citizen Suit against mining projects due to the omission to analyze the worsening of extreme weather events within the environmental licensing process
At issue: The lawfulness of a further licensing round for North Sea oil and gas, and of related policy, including in respect of whether end use emissions are direct effects for the purposes of strategic environmental assessment.
At issue: Whether the Coal Authority, when granting an application to deconditionalise a coal licence, had misunderstood its powers, and whether the Welsh Ministers had any powers, under devolution legislation, in respect of that application.
At issue: Asking for the cancellation of the tacit rejection of the Presidency on the request to annul the license of the power plant in Çanakkale, Turkey.
At issue: Whether the federal government has unlawfully extended oil and gas permits of the coast of British Columbia under the Canada Petroleum Resources Act.
At issue: Whether the challenged norms contradict superior norms and cause an irreparable threat or harm to the environment by authorizing fracking in Colombia without sufficient regulation.
At issue: Whether, in the course of preparing its environment plan for regulatory approval, Santos should have consulted with the applicant and his community; Whether the applicant and his community are considered “relevant persons” for consultation under the relevant regulations
At issue: Whether Poland infringed Directive 2011/92 of the European Parliament and the Council on the environmental impact assessment (EIA) of certain public and private projects by adopting national legislation which allowed the competent authorities to extend the license for lignite mining without carrying out the EIA
At issue: Whether the decision of a Mines Inspector under the Mines Act (British Columbia) to issue a permit to operate a rock quarry was unreasonable because the Mines Inspector failed to consider the climate change impacts of the proposed quarry.