At issue: Violation of legal duty of care by the ING Bank due to lacking climate action in relation climate policies, financing and services, including scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.
At issue: Whether the Netherlands is legally obliged to take more stringent climate mitigation and adaptation action to protect inhabitants of the Dutch Island of Bonaire.
At issue: Whether the decision to grant environmental authorisation to conduct exploratory drilling off the South-West coast should be set aside in that it was taken without proper assessment of the environmental impacts of the proposed project
At issue: Whether the implementation plan for the NDC provides constitutionally required protection of the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs from the threat of climate change.
At issue: Whether the South Korean NDC provides constitutionally required protection of the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs from the threat of climate change.
At issue: Whether the climate law provides constitutionally required protection of the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs from the threat of climate change.
At issue: Whether Norway has violated the fundamental rights of Norwegian citizens and lower legislation through the adoption of three decisions concerning the plans for development and operation of petroleum (oil and gas) deposits in the North Sea by failing to include Scope 3 emissions in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
At issue: Negative human rights impacts of (expanding) fossil fuel activities by State-owned company Saudi Amraco, with support of major private financial institutions domiciled in Saudi Arabia, Japan, USA, UK and France.
At issue: Negative human rights impacts of (expanding) the Scarborough gas project and LNG facilities by Woodside Energy and BHP in Australia, especially on indigenous people’s rights due to damage to indigenous sacred art and songlines in Murujuga
At issue: France’s continued development of mega-basin projects in a context of climate change, and their impacts on the rights to environment, food and water, including the rights of smaller farmers.
At issue: Post-disaster recovery for the Indigenous Raizal people after hurricanes Eta and Iota in Colombia, including through reconstruction of safe, culturally appropriate and climate-resilient housing
At issue: Ongoing forced evictions and home demolitions along Karachi’s waterways, despite devastating impacts of unusually heavy monsoons and flooding, allegedly as part of Pakistan’s climate adaptation strategies.
At issue: Compatibility of the arrest and excessive sentencing of two climate activists in the United Kingdom with the right to peaceful assembly in Article 21 ICCPR
At issue: Thailand’s large-scale (re)forestation strategy to achieve GHG emission targets threatens the human rights of 14 forest-dependent Isan minority members in Sab Wai village, who are also land-right defenders
At issue: Whether Italy has breached its obligations under the Aarhus Convention by failing to inform and consult the public within the process of updating the National Energy and Climate Plan.
At issue: Whether the appellant was an internally displaced person according to the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. Whether the appellant was a refugee within the definition of 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Whether the appellant was a protected person within the meaning of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights