At issue: Whether Norway has violated the fundamental rights of Norwegian citizens and lower legislation through the adoption of three decisions concerning the plans for development and operation of petroleum (oil and gas) deposits in the North Sea by failing to include Scope 3 emissions in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
At issue: Whether the denial of the application for a Presidential Permit to construct the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Government’s actions leading to that denial amounted to unfair treatment of a Canadian corporation
At issue: Whether the SEA procedure imposes an obligation on the authorities to carry out a transboundary impact assessment under the Espoo Convention, an appropriate assessment pursuant to Article 6 of the Habitats Directive and an assessment of the project’s impact on climate change
At issue: Whether and to what extent aviation emissions should play a role in deciding whether planning permission should be granted for the expansion of an airport.
At issue: The requirement of the Municipality of Niterói to carry out a Neighborhood Impact Study (EIV) before granting a license for the construction of large residential and commercial buildings, with more than six floors, in the Icaraí neighborhood of Niterói.
At issue: It calls for the cancellation of all licenses and permits issued by the state agency regarding authorization for the controlled burning of sugarcane straw in the municipalities covered by the Campinas Judicial Subsection, as well as for the defendants to be prevented from issuing new licenses without the preparation of an Environmental Impact Study and Environmental Impact Report (EIA/RIMA).
At issue: The lawsuit seeks to order the defendants to adopt effective measures to comply with the guidelines, deadlines and targets set out in federal and state (Rio Grande do Sul) climate laws.
At issue: Whether a precautionary order can be ordered preventing seismic exploration/fossil fuel exploitation until proper environmental impact assessments can be conducted