Description: Action alleging violation of Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act by individual who bid on BLM leases he did not intend to pay for in order to prevent their use in a way that would worsen effects of climate change.
-
United States v. DeChristopher
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary 11/16/2009 Order Order issued granting U.S.'s motion in limine. A federal court in Utah held that an individual will not be allowed to present the “necessity defense” in a criminal proceeding. The individual was indicted for submitting several bids for oil and gas drilling leases on federal land that he did not intend to pay for. He argued that he did so to prevent the leases from being used in a way that would worsen the effects of climate change. The court held that the government’s motion in limine to prevent the individual from using the defense should be granted because the individual did not meet the criteria for allowing such a defense. -
United States v. DeChristopher
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary 09/14/2012 Opinion Download Opinion issued. On appeal, the Tenth Circuit upheld the conviction, holding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction and that the district court did not err in disallowing the individual from presenting the necessity defense, holding that the first prong, that there was no legal alternative to violating the law, was not present in this case given that the individual could have taken other steps, such as filing a lawsuit to stop the issuance of the leases.