• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Non-US
  • Non-U.S. Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation
  • Home
  • U.S. Litigation
  • Non-U.S. Litigation
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Non-US
  • About
  • Contact

SSHI LLC dba DR Horton v. City of Olympia

Filing Date: 2011
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • Industry Lawsuits
  • Constitutional Claims
    • Fifth Amendment
  • Constitutional Claims
    • Fourteenth Amendment
Principal Laws:
Fifth Amendment—Takings, Fourteenth Amendment, Washington Land Use Petition Act
Description: Challenge to denial of master plan application for densely populated "neighborhood village."
  • SSHI LLC dba DR Horton v. City of Olympia
    Docket number(s): 43300-1-II
    Court/Admin Entity: Wash. Ct. App.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    09/24/2013 Opinion Download Opinion issued affirming trial court's decision dismissing all claims. Developer DR Horton challenged the City of Olympia’s denial of its master plan application for an 80-acre “neighborhood village.” In its challenge under the Washington Land Use Petition Act, DR Horton claimed, among other things, that the City Council erred in denying the application for failure to satisfy public transit requirements. In an unpublished opinion, the Washington Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s orders dismissing the petition. With respect to the public transit requirements, the appellate court held that the Council had not erred in concluding that the proposed master plan failed to satisfy transit requirements. The court also concluded that the public transit requirement did not violate the developer’s substantive due process rights because it was grounded in the legitimate public purpose of reducing greenhouse gases.

© 2019 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

These materials are intended to be a useful resource and may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. They are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.

This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.OkColumbia University Website Cookie Notice