• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Sierra Club v. City of Chico

Filing Date: 2023
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • State Impact Assessment Laws
Principal Laws:
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Description: Challenge to a plan for a mixed-use development at a 1,448-acre site.
  • Sierra Club v. City of Chico
    Docket number(s): n/a
    Court/Admin Entity: Cal. Super. Ct.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    02/01/2023 Petition for Writ of Mandate Download Verified petition for writ of mandate. Environmental Groups Said CEQA Review for Proposed Development Failed to Adequately Consider Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impacts and Climate Change Impacts on Water Supply. Environmental groups challenged the City of Chico’s California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review for Valley’s Edge Specific Plan, which is planned for a 1,448-acre site and would consist of 2,777 dwelling units and 447,155 square feet of commercial development, as well as parks, open space, public facilities, and roadway infrastructure. The groups’ allegations included that the environmental impact report (EIR) failed to adequately disclose, analyze, and mitigate impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions. In particular, they alleged that the EIR failed to analyze emissions impacts from construction activities; failed to adequately disclose or mitigate inconsistencies with applicable land use and climate policies, including the City’s Climate Action Plan; and failed to mitigate significant impacts from mobile sources. The petition also alleged that the City failed to assess climate change impacts on the project’s water supply and demand.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.