• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of Fort Hall Reservation v. Hammond

Filing Date: 2020
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • NEPA
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Other Statutes and Regulations
Principal Laws:
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Fort Bridger Treaty of 1868, Act of June 6, 1900, United States' Trust Responsibility, Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA)
Description: Challenge to the U.S. Department of Interior’s approval of a land exchange to facilitate expansion of phosphogypsum stacks located on a Superfund site.
  • Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of Fort Hall Reservation v. Hammond
    Docket number(s): 4:20-cv-00553
    Court/Admin Entity: D. Idaho
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    12/05/2020 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Lawsuit Challenged Land Exchange for Expansion of Gypsum Stacks. The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes filed a lawsuit in federal court in Idaho challenging the U.S. Department of Interior’s approval of a land exchange to facilitate expansion of phosphogypsum stacks located on a Superfund site adjacent to the Fort Hall Reservation. The Tribes alleged that the environmental impact statement failed to satisfy National Environmental Policy Act requirements, including by failing to adequately evaluate air quality and climate change impacts. The Tribes also asserted violations of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, the Act of June 6, 1900 (which the Tribes alleged reaffirmed off-reservation treaty rights), the Fort Bridger Treaty of 1868, and the U.S.’s trust responsibility.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.