• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Safe Skies Clean Water Wisconsin, Inc. v. National Guard Bureau

Filing Date: 2020
Case Categories:
  • Adaptation
    • Reverse Impact Assessment
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • NEPA
Principal Laws:
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Description: Challenge to the environmental review for construction and demolition projects at the Wisconsin Air National Guard’s 115th Fighter Wing Installation at a regional airport in Madison.
  • Safe Skies Clean Water Wisconsin, Inc. v. National Guard Bureau
    Docket number(s): 3:20-cv-01086
    Court/Admin Entity: W.D. Wis.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    01/03/2022 Opinion and Order Download Plaintiff motion for summary judgment denied and defendants' motion for summary judgment granted. Federal Court Upheld NEPA Review for Projects at Wisconsin Air National Guard Site. The federal district court for the Western District of Wisconsin rejected claims that the National Guard Bureau violated the National Environmental Policy Act when it evaluated 27 construction, demolition, and renovation projects at the 115th Fighter Wing installation of the Wisconsin Air National Guard at the Dane County Regional Airport in Madison. The court found that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that an environmental impact statement or supplemental environmental assessment should have been prepared and also found that the environmental review had not been improperly segmented from the review of a decision to base F-35A aircraft at the airport—a decision that the plaintiff challenged in a separate action. In rejecting the improper segmentation claim, the court also rejected the argument that the National Guard Bureau failed to consider climate change—the court said the defendants were not obligated to consider the effects of the decision to “beddown” F-35A aircraft at the airport, and that the plaintiff could pursue this argument in the other action. The court also found that the defendants adequately considered cumulative effects and environmental justice and did not violate notice and public participation requirements.
    12/07/2020 Complaint Download Complaint filed. NEPA Lawsuit Alleged Failure to Consider Climate Change in Environmental Review for Projects at Air National Guard Facility. A nonprofit organization challenged the environmental review for construction and demolition projects at the Wisconsin Air National Guard’s 115th Fighter Wing Installation at a regional airport in Madison. The plaintiff asserted that the National Guard Bureau violated NEPA by preparing an environmental assessment instead of an environmental impact statement and by issuing a finding of no significant impact. Among the NEPA violations alleged in the complaint was a failure to adequately consider climate change, including by minimizing the project’s greenhouse gas emissions and by failing to consider climate change effects on soil and groundwater emissions of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.