• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Residents for Sane Trash Solutions, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Filing Date: 2012
Case Categories:
  • Adaptation
    • Reverse Impact Assessment
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Clean Water Act
  • Adaptation
    • Actions seeking adaptation measures
Principal Laws:
Clean Water Act (CWA)
Description: Challenge to Corps wetlands permit for solid waste marine transfer station on East River in New York City.
  • Residents for Sane Trash Solutions, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
    Docket number(s): 12 Civ. 8456 (PAC)
    Court/Admin Entity: S.D.N.Y.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    07/10/2014 Opinion and Order Download Decision to issue permit upheld. The federal district court for the Southern District of New York upheld the issuance by the United States Army Corps of Engineers of a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for a solid waste marine transfer station on the East River on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. Among the arguments rejected by the court was that New York City should have prepared a supplemental environmental impact statement to address both flooding after Superstorm Sandy and also the issuance of new advisory flood maps by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The court said the City’s actions, which included preparation of a technical memorandum after issuance of the FEMA maps and incorporation of additional floodproofing measures, satisfied “hard look” requirements under New York’s State Environmental Quality Review Act. The court also rejected the claim that the Corps should have supplemented its own environmental review after Sandy.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.