Description: Challenge to City of Boulder ordinances that took steps to implement creation of new municipal utility.
-
City of Boulder v. Public Service Co. of Colorado
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary 06/18/2018 Opinion Download Dismissal reversed and case directed to be returned to district court. Colorado Supreme Court Revived Challenge to Boulder Light and Power Utility. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that the Public Service Company of Colorado’s (Xcel’s) lawsuit challenging a City of Boulder ordinance establishing a light and power utility was timely and viable. Xcel asserted that the ordinance violated the City Charter, which sets forth “metrics” that must be met for the City to have the authority to establish a utility. The Supreme Court did not weigh in on the merits of the case but directed that the case be returned to the district court for further proceedings on Xcel’s claim that the City did not satisfy the required metrics, which included a requirement of demonstrating that the utility could create a plan for reduced greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants and increased renewable energy. -
Public Service Co. of Colorado v. City of Boulder
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary 09/22/2016 Opinion Download Opinion issued ruling that district court lacked jurisdiction. Colorado Appellate Court Said Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Consider City of Boulder Ordinances That Took Steps Toward Establishment of New Utility That Would Increase Renewable Generation. The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that a district court lacked jurisdiction over a challenge by Public Service Company of Colorado (Xcel) to ordinances passed by the City of Boulder to implement a charter amendment that authorized the City to establish a new light and power utility if certain conditions were met. (Xcel is the current provider of electricity to Boulder customers.) One of the charter amendment’s conditions required that the new utility have a plan for reduced greenhouse gas emissions and increased renewable energy. The two ordinances challenged by Xcel accepted a third-party expert’s conclusion that the conditions precedent had been met and stated the City’s intention to establish a new utility. The appellate court said that the district court had erred in dismissing Xcel’s action as time-barred, but that the district court did not have jurisdiction because the ordinances were not final actions. More documents in this case are available here. -
Public Service Co. of Colorado v. City of Boulder