• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Protect Our Homes and Hills v. County of Orange

Filing Date: 2015
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • State Impact Assessment Laws
Principal Laws:
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Description: Challenge to environmental review for residential development in Orange County, California.
  • Protect Our Homes & Hills v. County of Orange
    Docket number(s): G055716
    Court/Admin Entity: Cal. Ct. App.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    05/08/2019 Opinion Download Opinion issued reversing the trial court order that discharged the writ of mandate and directing trial court to require County to take additional actions. California Appellate Court Said County Must Support Conclusion That Requiring Solar Panels in New Residential Development Was Infeasible. The California Court of Appeal found that a revised final environmental impact report (FEIR) prepared to remedy previously identified deficiencies failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act because the FEIR did not include any evidence supporting its conclusion that it was infeasible to require use of solar panels to mitigate a residential development’s greenhouse gas impacts. The trial court had discharged a previously issued writ that was based both on Orange County’s improper deferral of consideration of greenhouse gas mitigation measures and also on arbitrary limits on the consideration of mitigation measures. The appellate court said that in considering whether to discharge its writ, the trial court should have addressed the argument that the County had failed to consider the impact reduction potential of solar roof panels, an additional mitigation measure that was brought to the County’s attention in conjunction with preparation of the revised FEIR. The appellate court concluded, however, that the petitioners were barred from raising an argument concerning the County’s reliance on greenhouse gas emission reductions from statewide measures because the trial court previously rejected a similar argument “spun in a slightly different way” when it first considered the case. The appellate court also rejected the petitioners’ argument that the County was required to analyze greenhouse gas reductions that would result from a reduced density alternative.
  • Protect Our Homes and Hills v. County of Orange
    Docket number(s): G054185
    Court/Admin Entity: Cal. Ct. App.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    10/13/2017 Opinion Download Trial court's judgment reversed in part and trial court directed to grant petition for writ of mandate with respect to issues in addition to the greenhouse gas mitigation issue.
  • Protect Our Homes and Hills v. County of Orange
    Docket number(s): 30-2015-00797300
    Court/Admin Entity: Cal. Super. Ct.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    07/22/2016 Decision Download Statement of decision issued expressing intent to issue a writ. The court rejected almost all arguments regarding shortcomings in the environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act for a residential development that would include up to 340 single-family homes on 470 acres in Orange County, but found that the environmental impact report had impermissibly deferred mitigation of greenhouse gas impacts and arbitrarily limited the extent to which such mitigation measures must be considered.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.