• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Nucor Steel-Arkansas v. Big River Steel, LLC

Filing Date: 2014
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Clean Air Act
      • Industry Lawsuits
        • Other Regulation
Principal Laws:
Clean Air Act (CAA)
Description: Citizen suit brought by steel company to challenge air permits for rival company’s facility.
  • Nucor Steel – Arkansas v. Big River Steel, LLC
    Docket number(s): 15-1615
    Court/Admin Entity: 8th Cir.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    06/08/2016 Opinion Download Opinion issued. Eighth Circuit Affirmed Dismissal of Competitors’ Clean Air Act Citizen Suit Against Steel Mill. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal on subject matter jurisdiction grounds of a Clean Air Act citizen suit brought by companies that operated steel mills in Arkansas to stop construction of a competitor’s steel mill. The original complaint alleged that the defendant company had failed to satisfy Best Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements, including by conducting an improper greenhouse gas BACT analysis and by improperly eliminating carbon capture and sequestration as a control technology. The Eighth Circuit’s opinion did not address the greenhouse gas-specific allegations of the lawsuit but noted that BACT requirements did not impose ongoing duties to apply BACT and that failure to comply with BACT requirements therefore could not constitute the ongoing or repeated violations required for a citizen suit.
  • Nucor Steel-Arkansas v. Big River Steel, LLC
    Docket number(s): 3:14-cv-00193
    Court/Admin Entity: E.D. Ark.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    02/25/2015 Opinion and Order Download Opinion and order issued. The federal district court for the Eastern District of Arkansas dismissed a Clean Air Act citizen suit brought against a steel company by a rival steel company concerning a Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit issued by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality.  The plaintiff’s allegations included that the defendant had failed to satisfy Best Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements, including by conducting an improper greenhouse gas BACT analysis and by improperly eliminating carbon capture and sequestration as a control technology. The court dismissed the action as an impermissible collateral attack on a state-issued air permit.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.