• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. U.S. Department of the Interior

Filing Date: 2018
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • NEPA
Principal Laws:
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Description: Challenge to decision to lease lands in National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska for oil and gas drilling.
  • Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. U.S. Department of the Interior
    Docket number(s): 19-35008
    Court/Admin Entity: 9th Cir.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    07/09/2020 Opinion Download Summary judgment for the defendants affirmed. Ninth Circuit Said 2012 EIS Properly Served as NEPA Analysis for 2017 Lease Sales in National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of the defendants in a case challenging compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) prior to BLM’s 2017 offer and sale of oil and gas leases in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. The Ninth Circuit deferred to BLM’s “reasonable position” that a 2012 environmental impact statement (EIS) that evaluated the management of all BLM-managed lands in the Reserve encompassed future lease sales; the court therefore rejected claims that BLM violated NEPA or its regulations by failing to prepare a NEPA analysis prior to the 2017 lease sale. The Ninth Circuit further concluded that the claim that BLM failed to take a hard look at the 2017 lease sale’s impacts was time-barred under the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act’s statute of limitations. The Ninth Circuit said the BLM’s only remaining hard look obligation was to analyze new circumstances and new information, but the court said the plaintiffs had waived any supplementation claim.
  • Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. U.S. Department of the Interior
    Docket number(s): 3:18-cv-00030
    Court/Admin Entity: D. Alaska
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    12/06/2018 Order Download Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment denied and intervenor-defendant's and federal defendants' cross-motions for summary judgment granted. Alaska Federal Court Rejected Challenges to Lease Sales in National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. The federal district court for the District of Alaska rejected assertions that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) was required to prepare an environmental impact statement or environmental assessment prior to issuing 2017 leases in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. The court rejected this argument, concluding that Ninth Circuit precedent upholding issuance of leases prior to a site-specific analysis of each lease parcel was controlling. As in a separate case decided the same day, the court held that the plaintiffs waived any claims that BLM should have supplemented its earlier review in an Integrated Activity Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (IAP/EIS) finalized in 2012.
    08/07/2018 Reply Download Reply filed by plaintiff in support of motion for summary judgment.
    07/24/2018 Response Download Intervenor-defendant ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. filed response in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment.
    07/24/2018 Response Download Federal defendants filed response to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment.
    06/04/2018 Motion for Summary Judgment Download Memorandum filed in support of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
    05/21/2018 Complaint Download First amended complaint filed.
    02/02/2018 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Environmental Groups Launched NEPA Challenge to Oil and Gas Leasing in National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska. Five environmental groups filed a lawsuit in federal court in Alaska challenging the federal decision to lease lands in the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska. The plaintiffs asserted that the defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) because the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) failed to prepare either an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement before conducting an oil and gas lease sale in December 2017 for approximately 10.3 million acres in the Reserve. One of the environmental groups submitted comments to BLM prior to the sale, urging the agency not to conduct further leasing until it had completed site-specific environmental analysis by taking a hard look at direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts, including contributions to climate change.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.