• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

New York v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Filing Date: 2019
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Other Statutes and Regulations
Principal Laws:
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA)
Description: Challenge to the reversal of an inflation adjustment to the civil penalty for violations of Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards.
  • New York v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    Docket number(s): 19-2395
    Court/Admin Entity: 2d Cir.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    08/31/2020 Opinion Download Reversal of penalty increase vacated. Second Circuit Reinstated Penalty Increase for Fuel Economy Violations. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA’s) reversal of a 2016 increase to the penalty for violations of fuel economy standards. In 2016, NHTSA increased the penalty pursuant to Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act (the Improvements Act) from $5.50 to $14 for every tenth of a mile per gallon below the applicable standard, multiplied by the number of cars in a manufacturer’s fleet. In 2019, NHTSA reversed the increase based on its conclusion that the Improvements Act did not apply to the fuel economy penalty and that, even if the Act did apply, the penalty’s “negative economic impact” was sufficient to support reversal. The Second Circuit rejected both rationales. First, the Second Circuit held that the penalty was a “civil monetary penalty” under the Improvements Act. NHTSA therefore was required to adjust the penalty rate in accordance with the Improvements Act’s requirements. Second, the court held that reconsideration and reversal of the increase based on economic consequences was untimely and therefore beyond NHTSA’s authority.
    11/25/2019 Amicus Motion Download Motion filed by Tesla, Inc. for leave to participate as amicus curiae in support of petitioners.
    09/10/2019 Order Download Motions to intervene granted.
    08/30/2019 Motion to Intervene Download Motion to intervene filed by Association of Global Automakers.
    08/29/2019 Motion to Intervene Download Motion to intervene filed by Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.
    08/02/2019 Petition for Review Download Petition for review filed. States, D.C., Environmental Groups Challenged Penalty Reduction for Violations of Vehicle Standards. Twelve states, the District of Columbia, and two environmental groups filed petitions for review in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA’s) decision to reverse an inflation adjustment to the civil penalty for violations of Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards. NHTSA determined that the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Inflation Adjustment Act) did not apply and further concluded that even if the Inflation Adjustment Act did apply, the increased penalty rate would have a negative economic impact and therefore that in accordance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, the lower rate should be reinstated.
  • Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    Docket number(s): 19-2508
    Court/Admin Entity: 2d Cir.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    08/12/2019 Petition for Review Download Petition for review filed.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.