• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority

Filing Date: 2010
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • State Impact Assessment Laws
Principal Laws:
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Description: Challenge to baseline greenhouse gas conditions for planned light rail line.
  • Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority
    Docket number(s): B232655
    Court/Admin Entity: Cal. Ct. App.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    05/09/2012 Order Download Order issued modifying opinion for partial publication.
    04/17/2012 Opinion Download Affirms Superior Court of Los Angeles County's decision denying the citizens' group's petition for a writ of mandate. A California appellate court affirmed a ruling that held that a public authority responsible for constructing a light rail line connection downtown Los Angeles with Santa Monica did not violate the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) when it analyzed the impact of the project on, among other things, greenhouse gas emissions using as a baseline conditions projected for 2030. The court rejected the notion that CEQA forbids, as a matter of law, the use of projected conditions as a baseline. The petitioners had argued that CEQA required the authority to use baseline conditions that existed sometime when the notice of preparation of the construction phase was filed in 2007 and when the authority certified the final environmental impact report in 2010. The appellate court disagreed, holding that that the project would not begin operating until 2015 at the earliest and thus its impact would yield no practical information to decision makers or the public until that time. 

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.