• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Nebraska v. EPA

Filing Date: 2014
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Clean Air Act
      • Industry Lawsuits
        • Clean Power Plan
Principal Laws:
Clean Air Act (CAA)
Description: Challenge to proposed GHG new source performance standards for fossil fuel-fired electric generating units.
  • Nebraska v. EPA
    Docket number(s): 4:14-CV-3006
    Court/Admin Entity: D. Neb.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    10/06/2014 Memorandum Download Memorandum and order issued dismissing case. The federal district court for the District of Nebraska dismissed the lawsuit. The court agreed with EPA that Nebraska’s “attempt to short-circuit the administrative rulemaking process runs contrary to basic, well-understood administrative law.” The district court said that there had been no final agency action and that the Clean Air Act provided an adequate remedy—review of any final rule by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
    01/15/2014 Complaint Download Complaint filed. A week after EPA proposed new source performance standards for greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, the State of Nebraska commenced a lawsuit seeking an order enjoining EPA’s work on the rulemaking and requiring withdrawal of the proposed rule. Nebraska alleged that the proposed rule violated the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which provides that EPA may not base required technologies or emissions reductions levels under section 111 of the CAA solely on the use of technologies by facilities receiving assistance under the Energy Policy Act. Nebraska’s complaint sought a declaration that the proposed rule’s consideration of the federally financed deployment of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) to support the finding that CCS is “adequately demonstrated” for section 111 purposes was unlawful.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.