• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

National Chicken Council v. EPA

Filing Date: 2010
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Clean Air Act
      • Industry Lawsuits
        • Renewable Fuel Standards
Principal Laws:
Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA)
Description: Challenge to renewable fuel standard.
  • National Chicken Council v. EPA
    Docket number(s): 10-1107
    Court/Admin Entity: D.C. Cir.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    07/20/2012 Opinion Download Opinion issued. In July 2012, the D.C. Circuit dismissed the lawsuit, holding that plaintiffs did not have standing to maintain the lawsuit given that that even if the rule was overturned, there was no evidence that ethanol producers would reduce their production and thus they could not show substantial probably of injury redress.
    05/25/2010 Petition for Review Petition for review filed. A coalition of meat industry groups filed a lawsuit challenging EPA criteria for determining which biofuels meet the U.S. renewable fuels standard. The meat industry lawsuit objected to provisions in the rule that deemed some ethanol facilities at which construction commenced in 2008 and 2009 to be compliant with the standard. The final rule exempted ethanol produced from corn at facilities in or at which construction commenced before December 17, 2007 from the requirement that a renewable fuel must reduce life-cycle GHG emissions by at least 20 percent compared with gasoline. In the final rule, EPA extended the exemption to ethanol produced at facilities that use natural gas or biofuels as an energy source at which construction began before December 31, 2009. 

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.