• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Massachusetts v. West Roxbury Protesters

Filing Date: 2016
Case Categories:
  • Climate Change Protesters and Scientists
    • Protesters
Principal Laws:
Necessity/Justification Defense
Description: Prosecution of activists who protested the West Roxbury Lateral Pipeline in Massachusetts.
  • Massachusetts v. West Roxbury Protesters
    Docket number(s): n/a
    Court/Admin Entity: Mass. Dist. Ct.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    03/27/2018 Verdict Defendants acquitted on basis of necessity defense. Massachusetts Court Acquitted Pipeline Protesters by Reason of Necessity. The Climate Disobedience Center announced on March 27, 2018 that a Massachusetts district court had acquitted—based on a necessity defense—13 defendants arrested in 2016 while protesting the West Roxbury Lateral Pipeline. The Climate Defense Project, one of the organizations whose attorneys represented the defendants, said the defense had prepared for a full trial in which they would mount a climate necessity defense—relying on experts including climate scientist James Hansen and the founder of 350.org, Bill McKibben—but that the prosecutor had reduced charges of trespass and disorderly conduct to civil infractions that did not require a trial. The Climate Disobedience Center said the judge nevertheless allowed each defendant to testify regarding the necessity of their actions. The Center has posted the official court audio here.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.