• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Marte v. City of New York

Filing Date: 2022
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • Environmentalist Lawsuits
  • State Law Claims
    • State Impact Assessment Laws
Principal Laws:
New York Constitution-Environmental Rights Amendment, New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA)
Description: Lawsuit alleging that development of three skyscrapers on Lower East Side of Manhattan violated the New York Constitution's Environmental Rights Amendment.
  • Marte v. City of New York
    Docket number(s): n/a
    Court/Admin Entity: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    10/21/2022 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Lower Manhattan Plaintiffs Said Development Project Violated New Environmental Rights Amendment. A New York City Councilmember and residents of Manhattan’s Lower East Side filed a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court alleging that the development of a project that included three skyscrapers violated the New York Constitution’s new Environmental Rights Amendment and the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The Amendment provides that “each person shall have a right to clean air and water, and a healthful environment.” The plaintiffs alleged that the Amendment required the City to take a hard look at the Amendment’s impact on the project’s implementation and to determine whether it would implicate the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights. They contended that a supplemental environmental impact statement was required to look at this issue. The suit included climate change-related allegations, including that the final environmental impact statement failed to evaluate impacts on greenhouse gas emissions and climate change “as mandated by the Constitutional Amendment.”

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.