• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

In re Proposed Expansion of Daley Farms of Lewiston LLP et al.

Filing Date: 2019
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • State Impact Assessment Laws
Principal Laws:
Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act, Minnesota Environmental Policy Act
Description: Challenge to decisions by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency denial of requests for a contested-case hearing on a NPDES feedlot permit and for an environmental impact statement for expansion of dairy.
  • In re Proposed Expansion of Daley Farms of Lewiston LLP et al.
    Docket number(s): A19-0207 & A19-0209
    Court/Admin Entity: Minn. Ct. App.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    10/14/2019 Opinion Download Reversed and remanded. Minnesota Appellate Court Said Pollution Control Agency Must Consider Dairy Farm Expansion’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions. In an unpublished opinion, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA’s) determination that an environmental impact statement was not necessary for the proposed expansion of a dairy farm concentrated animal feeding operation. The court concluded that the MPCA should have considered greenhouse gas emissions—an issue raised by an environmental group during the comment period—even though the issue was not included on the alternative environmental assessment worksheet for animal feedlots used in the environmental review. The court noted that the MPCA did not dispute that large dairy farm operations emit methane and also that the MPCA indicated that it was considering changing its review for feedlots to include greenhouse gas emissions, implying that “the MPCA was aware of, but failed to consider the potential effects of the greenhouse-gas emissions.” The court rejected other objections to the MPCA’s determinations.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.