• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Hapner v. Tidwell

Filing Date: 2008
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • NEPA
Principal Laws:
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Description: Challenge to proposed U.S. Forest Service plan to remove timber, including on grounds that environmental assessment did not look at proposed effects of climate change.
  • Hapner v. Tidwell
    Docket number(s): 09-35896
    Court/Admin Entity: 9th Cir.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    09/15/2010 Opinion Download Opinion issued. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision, holding that the brief discussion of climate change in the environmental assessment was appropriate given that the project involved a small amount of land and it would thin rather than clear cut trees.
  • Hapner v. Tidwell
    Docket number(s): CV 08-92-M-DWM
    Court/Admin Entity: D. Mont.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    10/30/2008 Order Download Defendants' and plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment granted in part and denied in part; judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs. Environmental groups filed a lawsuit challenging a U.S. Forest Service decision to remove timber for fire protection purposes. The groups alleged, among other claims, that the Forest Service did not comply with the National Environmental Policy Act because the environmental assessment prepared by the agency did not look at the effects of climate change would have on the decision. The court disagreed, finding that no such analysis was required because the action would not have a direct effect on climate change. The court found other shortcomings in the review of the action and therefore enjoined the Forest Service from commencing the project until it had completed additional work.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.