Description: Action challenging federal government's decisions to hold offshore oil and gas lease sales.
-
Gulf Restoration Network v. Haaland
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary 08/30/2022 Opinion Download Summary judgment for defendants reversed in part and case remanded to the district court with instructions to remand it to the agency for further consideration; administrative orders left in place. D.C. Circuit Left Gulf of Mexico Oil and Gas Leases in Place but Remanded for Additional Consideration of Reported Enforcement Deficiencies. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals remanded a challenge to the environmental review of two Gulf of New Mexico oil and gas lease sales to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) for consideration of a Government Accountability Office report that found deficiencies in enforcement of safety and environmental requirements. The D.C. Circuit declined to vacate the leases, supplemental environmental impact statement, or records of decision. The court also rejected the petitioners’ other arguments, including claims that BOEM failed to consider a true no-action alternative in which no leasing occurred and that BOEM should have considered potential changes to rules intended to reduce offshore drilling risks. 10/08/2021 Reply Download Reply brief filed by appellants. 08/09/2021 Brief Download Brief filed by federal appellees. 04/27/2021 Brief Download Opening brief filed by appellants. -
Gulf Restoration Network v. Zinke
Case Documents:
Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary 04/21/2020 Memorandum Opinion Download Federal defendants' and intervenor-defendants' motions for summary judgment granted. Federal Court Rejected NEPA Claims in Challenge to Gulf of Mexico Leases. A federal district court in the District of Columbia ruled that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) fulfilled its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in connection with two offshore oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico. First, the court found that BOEM considered a “true” no action alternative, rejecting the plaintiffs’ argument that it was improper to assume that future leasing would result in the same effects under the no action alternative. Second, the court was not persuaded that BOEM’s hard look at impacts was undermined by reliance on safety rules that were being partially repealed and that were allegedly enforced inadequately. Third, the court rejected the argument that a supplemental environmental impact statement was necessary due to a reduction in royalty rate that the plaintiffs argued would result in higher levels of development and production than were assessed. 07/16/2018 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Environmental Groups Challenged Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Sales in Gulf of Mexico. Gulf Restoration Network, Sierra Club, and Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit against Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke and other defendants to challenge decisions to hold offshore lease sales for oil and gas development in the Gulf of Mexico. The plaintiffs asserted that the defendants relied on “arbitrary” environmental analyses in violation of NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act. The complaint alleges two “fundamental defects” in the NEPA analysis: (1) an “irrational reliance on the false assumptions that preexisting, safer policies would remain in place,” even though the Department of the Interior had begun to implement repeals of drilling safety regulations and reductions in royalty rates, and (2) an assumption that the same projected environmental effects would occur even if the lease sales were not held. The complaint alleged that oil and gas development in the Gulf contributes significantly to climate change through emissions emitted by exploration, development, and production operations, as well as downstream combustion.