• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance v. City of Los Angeles

Filing Date: 2017
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • State Impact Assessment Laws
Principal Laws:
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Description: Lawsuit challenging environmental review for a 34-story building in Los Angeles.
  • Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance v. City of Los Angeles
    Docket number(s): B294231
    Court/Admin Entity: Cal. Ct. App.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    01/28/2020 Opinion Download Trial court order denying mandate petition affirmed. California Court of Appeal Affirmed Dismissal of CEQA Greenhouse Gas Challenge to 34-Story Building in Los Angeles. The California Court of Appeal ruled that a petitioner failed to exhaust administrative remedies because it had not asserted during administrative proceedings its specific claim that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review for a 34-story building in Los Angeles did not properly assess the project’s compliance with greenhouse gas emission targets for 2030 and 2050 established by executive orders. The court said the petitioner’s comments on the draft and final environmental impact reports concerning the analysis of greenhouse gas emissions were not sufficient to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court therefore affirmed the denial of the mandate petition with regard to greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance v. City of Los Angeles
    Docket number(s): B295988
    Court/Admin Entity: Cal. Ct. App.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    07/10/2020 Opinion Download Order denying attorney fees is affirmed.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.