• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

East Phillips Neighborhood Institute, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis

Filing Date: 2021
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • State Impact Assessment Laws
Principal Laws:
Minnesota Environmental Policy Act
Description: Challenge to the City of Minneapolis' environmental review for the proposed expansion of a water maintenance facility.
  • East Phillips Neighborhood Institute, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis
    Docket number(s): A21-1297
    Court/Admin Entity: Minn. Ct. App.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    02/06/2023 Opinion Download City's decision affirmed. Minnesota Appellate Court Rejected Claim that Minneapolis Failed to Consider Climate Impacts of Expanding Water Maintenance Facility. The Minnesota Court of Appeals found that the City of Minneapolis’s environmental-assessment worksheet (EAW) for the proposed expansion of a water maintenance facility was complete and accurate in compliance with applicable authorities. Among the arguments rejected by the court was a contention that the EAW did not address the project’s climate change impacts. The court first stated that a 2019 nonprecedential decision did not establish a requirement that EAWs must consider greenhouse gas emissions. The court further found that in this case, Minneapolis included data on current greenhouse gas emissions and projected increases in emissions. In addition, the court noted that the City had indicated in responses to public comments that it would rely on its Climate Action Plan and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s recommended green practices to mitigate the project’s climate change effects.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.