• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Erickson

Filing Date: 2022
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • NEPA
Principal Laws:
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Description: Challenge to revised Custer Gallatin National Forest Plan, including for failure to take a hard look at the impacts of logging when combined with climate change.
  • Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Erickson
    Docket number(s): 2:22-cv-00005
    Court/Admin Entity: D. Mont.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    02/04/2022 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Conservation Group Sought to Block Timber Sales in National Forest Based on Alleged Failure to Consider Climate Impacts. A conservation group filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Montana alleging that the U.S. Forest Service violated NEPA by failing to take a hard look at the impacts of logging when combined with climate change in the revised Custer Gallatin National Forest Plan. The complaint alleged that the Forest Service previously determined that revisions to the plan were necessary to address climate change impacts but that the agency failed to disclose and analyze information from a 2017 article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that found that forest thinning combined with warming could result in conversion of forested areas to nonforest when it concluded that forests affected by old growth timber sales would remain forests. The plaintiff asked the court to vacate and enjoin the old growth timber sales and partially vacate the forest plan and associated NEPA analysis.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.