Description: Challenge to denial of water quality certification for natural gas pipeline from Pennsylvania to New York.
Constitution Pipeline Co. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary 04/30/2018 Order List Download Certiorari petition denied. Supreme Court Declined to Review New York’s Denial of Water Quality Certification for Gas Pipeline. The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari to a pipeline developer seeking review of a Second Circuit decision that upheld the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s denial of a water quality certification for an interstate natural gas pipeline. The developer had argued that denial of the certification interfered with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s exclusive jurisdiction and violated fundamental principles of federal supremacy. 04/09/2018 Reply Download Reply brief submitted in support of petition for writ of certiorari. 03/22/2018 Opposition Download Brief filed by intervenors-respondents Catskill Mountainkeeper, Inc.; Riverkeeper, Inc.; and Sierra Club in opposition to petition for writ of certiorari. 03/14/2018 Opposition Download Brief filed by New York State respondents in opposition to petition for writ of certiorari. 01/16/2018 Petition for Writ of Certiorari Download Petition for writ of certiorari filed by Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC. Pipeline Company Sought Supreme Court Review of New York’s Denial of Water Quality Certification for Natural Gas Pipeline. Constitutional Pipeline Company, LLC filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court seeking review of the Second Circuit’s decision upholding the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s (NYSDEC’s) denial of a water quality certification for an interstate natural gas pipeline. The company argued that Congress had given the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission the authority to determine the location of interstate pipelines and that NYSDEC had interfered with this authority by denying the water quality certification on the ground that the company had not provided sufficient information about alternative pipeline routes. In its letter denying the certification, NYSDEC also cited potential climate change-related impacts to water resources. The company said the case presented the question of whether the denial of the certification interfered with FERC’s exclusive jurisdiction and violated fundamental principles of federal supremacy.
Constitution Pipeline Co. v. Seggos
Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary 10/19/2017 Order Download Petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc denied. Second Circuit Declined to Rehear Decision Upholding New York’s Denial of Water Quality Certificate for Pipeline. On October 19, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a natural gas pipeline developer’s petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc of its ruling that upheld the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s denial of a water quality certificate for the pipeline. 09/01/2017 Petition for Rehearing Download Petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc filed. The developer argued in a petition for panel or rehearing en banc that the Second Circuit’s conclusion that New York could consider alternative routes for Natural Gas Act projects conflicted with other precedent of the Second Circuit as well as precedent of the Supreme Court and other circuit courts of appeals. The developer also argued that the Second Circuit had prematurely decided the merits of the case when it should have held the case in abeyance until the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) determined whether the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation had waived the water quality certificate requirement by taking too long to render a decision on the developer’s application. 08/18/2017 Opinion Download Opinion issued upholding denial. Second Circuit Upheld State Denial of Water Quality Certificate for Natural Gas Pipeline. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC’s) denial of an interstate natural gas pipeline developer’s application for a Water Quality Certificate under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. As a threshold matter, the Second Circuit concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the developer’s argument that DEC had waived its right to rule on the application because it failed to act on the application within the time period required by the Clean Water Act. On the merits, the Second Circuit rejected the developer’s contention that DEC’s action was preempted by FERC’s performance of its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act. The Second Circuit said the Natural Gas Act and Clean Water Act entitled DEC to conduct its own review of the pipeline project’s impacts on New York waterbodies. The Second Circuit found that the denial of the application after the developer failed to provide information DEC had requested was not arbitrary and capricious. In its brief defending the denial, DEC noted that removal of riparian vegetation to build the project could increase water temperatures and that climate change could exacerbate these impacts in the long term. 09/12/2016 Brief Download Brief filed by New York State respondents. NYSDEC, Environmental Groups Filed Briefs Defending Denial of Water Quality Certification for Constitution Pipeline. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) filed a brief opposing Constitution Pipeline Co., LLC’s challenge to NYSDEC’s denial of a Clean Water Act Section 401 water quality certification for the Constitution Pipeline Project, approximately 100 miles of which passes through New York. DEC said that its denial was “timely, rational, supported by the record, and consistent with the applicable federal and state legal standards.” In its brief, DEC noted that increased water temperatures caused by removal of riparian vegetation could limit habitat suitability for cold-water species, and that such impacts could be exacerbated by climate change in the long term. Two other briefs were filed by intervenors opposing the challenge, including a brief from a group called Stop the Pipeline (STP). STP’s arguments included a call for additional environmental review to consider supplemental material regarding risks of extreme weather caused by climate change. 09/12/2016 Brief Download Brief filed by intervenors Catskill Moutainkeeper, Sierra Club, and Riverkeeper. 09/12/2016 Brief Download Brief filed by intervenor Stop the Pipeline.