• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

City of Arcata v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

Filing Date: 2020
Case Categories:
  • State Law Claims
    • Other Types of State Law Cases
Principal Laws:
California Local Electricity Tax Ordinances, California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32)
Description: Lawsuit by California cities and county against utility for withholding amounts collected as greenhouse gas credits from electricity users from taxes paid to the plaintiffs under their electricity ordinances.
  • City of Arcata v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
    Docket number(s): CGC-20-585483
    Court/Admin Entity: Cal. Super. Ct.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    07/21/2020 Complaint Download Complaint filed. California Cities Filed Suit Contending PG&E Owed Them Taxes Collected as Greenhouse Gas Credits from Electricity Users. Sixteen California cities and Sacramento County sued Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) in California Superior Court, asserting that that PG&E unlawfully diverted tens of millions of dollars that it collects each year from utility users and that are owed to the local governments under their electricity tax ordinances. The amounts allegedly withheld by PG&E are amounts that its users pay with greenhouse gas credits issued under California’s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, pursuant to which the Public Utilities Commission developed three financial assistance programs for electric utility customers affected by increased rates due to the cap-and-trade program. The plaintiffs contended that their electricity tax ordinances apply to total charges for electricity consumed by PG&E users, regardless of whether customers pay by cash or by application of a greenhouse gas credit. The plaintiffs alleged that PG&E’s conduct undermined “the goals of California’s greenhouse gas law to reduce use of carbon-intensive power.”

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.