• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland

Filing Date: 2023
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes
Principal Laws:
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Description: Challenge to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's determination that the upper Missouri River population of Arctic grayling did not warrant listing under the Endangered Species Act.
  • Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland
    Docket number(s): 2:23-cv-00002
    Court/Admin Entity: D. Mont.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    01/30/2023 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Plaintiffs in Montana Federal Court Challenged Determination that Arctic Grayling Did Not Warrant Protection Under Endangered Species Act. A lawsuit filed in the federal district court for the District of Montana challenged the FWS’s determination that the upper Missouri River population of Arctic grayling did not warrant listing under the Endangered Species Act. The complaint alleged that the surviving populations “face a barrage of threats” such as low flows and barriers in river channels and warming water temperatures made “even more significant because of the current and predicted impacts of a changing climate, which are expected to reduce water flows and raise water temperatures even further.” The plaintiffs contended that the FWS impermissibly relied on unenforceable and voluntary conservation efforts to address threats to the grayling and also that the FWS failed to utilize best-available scientific information.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.