• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Cascadia Wildlands v. Adcock

Filing Date: 2022
Case Categories:
  • Federal Statutory Claims
    • NEPA
Principal Laws:
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Description: Challenge to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s approval of the plan for “a multi-decade series of logging projects on 13,225 acres of BLM-administered lands in Lane County west of Eugene, Oregon.”
  • Cascadia Wildlands v. Adcock
    Docket number(s): 6:22-cv-1344
    Court/Admin Entity: D. Or.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    09/08/2022 Complaint Download Complaint filed. Environmental Groups Said BLM Failed to Adequately Consider Environmental Impacts of Logging Plan in Oregon. Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Oregon challenging the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) approval of the plan for “a multi-decade series of logging projects on 13,225 acres of BLM-administered lands in Lane County west of Eugene, Oregon.” The plaintiffs asserted claims under the National Environmental Policy Act. Their specific allegations included that BLM “gave no in-depth consideration” to the project’s impacts on carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions and other areas of concern.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.