• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search
    • Search US
    • Search Global
  • Global Litigation
  • U.S. Litigation

Casa Mira Homeowners Association v. California Coastal Commission

Filing Date: 2021
Case Categories:
  • Constitutional Claims
    • Fifth Amendment
  • Adaptation
    • Challenges to adaptation measures
Principal Laws:
Fifth Amendment—Takings, California Constitution, California Coastal Act of 1976
Description: Challenge to the California Coastal Commission's approval of an amendment to the City of Half Moon Bay's Local Coastal Plan/Program, which would prohibit long-term shoreline protective devices.
  • Casa Mira Homeowners Association v. California Coastal Commission
    Docket number(s): 21-CIV-03202
    Court/Admin Entity: Cal. Super. Ct.
    Case Documents:
    Filing Date Type File Action Taken Summary
    06/09/2021 Petition Download Petition and complaint filed. A homeowners association and its members challenged the California Coastal Commission's approval and certification of the City of Half Moon Bay's amendment to its Local Coastal Program/Plan (LCP), which prohibited long-term shoreline protective devices. The petitioners asserted that the approval and certification violated the California Coastal Act and exceeded the Commission's authority, and that the actions constituted a taking without just compensation in violation of the U.S. and California Constitutions. The petitioners alleged that their homes faced a threat of bluff collapse and erosion and that the LCP amendment would limit them "to three long-term options to address bluff erosion and sea level rise – retrofitting, removal or relocation." The petitioners contended that these limits were inconsistent with rights bestowed on property owners by the Coastal Act.

© 2023 · Sabin Center for Climate Change Law · U.S. Litigation Chart made in collaboration with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

The materials on this website are intended to provide a general summary of the law and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult with counsel to determine applicable legal requirements in a specific fact situation.